These are times of great activity for the SSE,
focused on a singular objective: to connect the
implementation of the school to its vision. Previous
newsletters have spent considerable ink on
articulating a clear vision for the school and as we
write this newsletter, the next step seems obvious:
match the rhetoric and the ideal to reality. Quite
evidently, it will take years to ascertain whether
LUMS SSE is succeeding or failing. But continual
information exchange with the stakeholders will be
one vehicle through which we can determine if we are
on the right track. This newsletter is part of that
exchange. We attempt to communicate progress and
plans for some foundational activities in which we
are currently investing our energies. There is one
goal in doing this: either reinforce that our
efforts are indeed aligned with the SSE vision, or
invite constructive criticism early on so that our
efforts can be modified. By making our efforts more
transparent, we hope to gain the advantage of more
ideas and advice, since we cannot expect to have all
the wisdom and initiative within the small SSE
Project team and the Virtual Program Development
Team (VPDT). We also hope that this piece provides
the context within which later newsletters, which
will move towards more operational updates, can be
interpreted.
The SSE vision is to ultimately become a globally
competitive research school - clearly a multi-decade
agenda. The bulk of our efforts so far have been
along three dimensions which are the most
time-critical if the institution
is to evolve towards its goal: faculty,
funding and infrastructure. A significant amount of
effort has also been spent on others areas such as
curriculum and student admissions, but the deadlines
for them are less strict than the other three given
the school’s launch in Fall 2007, naturally
affecting the allocation of resources in the short
term.
Faculty
Faculty recruitment is one of our
major concerns. Finding good faculty is a recognized
first-order problem for administrators of higher
education in Pakistan, and the SSE will require
absolutely the best research and teaching faculty
possible. The basic numbers are as follows: Phase I
of the SSE plans to start new undergraduate programs
in Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Electrical
Engineering and one other engineering discipline;
with opportunistic initiation of graduate programs
in these disciplines if we find good faculty and
graduate students early. With the current launch
date of Fall 2007, this requires approximately 7
faculty to be hired this year, and a total of 15 by
summer 2007 (3 in each of the five new departments).
By summer 2010, 45 additional faculty members will
be needed, and by 2020, about 200 faculty members in
around 10 departments. With 2000 students, this will
bring our student faculty ratio to 10:1, comparable
with the best schools in the US.
Faculty hiring has been deliberately slowed down
until now because considerable time and energy has
been invested in policy review at LUMS. A committee
constituted in February 2005 is revising the process
for faculty appointments and promotions in order to
bring it in line with international norms. The
committee will address issues of tenure-track,
research startup grants, and legacy issues in
detail. We want to ensure that the environment we
create for our faculty allows them to achieve the
standards of excellence comparable with the best
research schools, and is at the same time compatible
with the Pakistani environment and circumstance.
Currently 3 faculty members are committed to joining
the school, in Physics, Electrical Engineering and
Operations Research; so meeting the 7 faculty goal
by the end of this year definitely seems achievable.
Before the end of summer, a systematic faculty
outreach exercise will be undertaken. To do this
effectively, we must know the pool of quality
candidates. However, good data for this pool is hard
to find. Part of our effort will be to invest in
building a good database of potential current and
future faculty, in order to have a sustainable
school in the long-run. The evolution of the faculty
body itself is a complex and multi-faceted process.
The people we wish to attract in the
beginning
are those with the potential to be strong custodians
of institutional quality, who understand and believe
in the SSE vision and mission.
Funding
Funding an enterprise of research
and education requires significant resources. For
the SSE’s setup costs, such as creation of new
facilities, and operating costs, such as faculty
salaries, research startup packages and student
financial aid, we plan to initially raise $25
million. Of this amount, we estimate to spend $8
million on the building, $7 million on equipment,
and $10 million on the operating deficit for 10
years. These are our current best estimates. As the
design of the laboratories gets more refined and we
start to identify the actual equipment to be
purchased we will have more precise estimates. We
will be incorporating our increasing understanding
into the financial model of the SSE, so that the
resources we raise remain commensurate with our
vision. An outreach effort will begin in the US this
summer to build a support community, tapping the
expertise and network of the Pakistani diaspora. As
a note, we do have $9.5 million in pledges
already, all raised from
private sources within Pakistan.
It is also important to communicate our
understanding of the long-term sustainability of the
school - beyond the first 10 years. Financing of
private higher education, specially research
schools, cannot be done on tuition alone. Tuition
in quality institutions is not even enough to cover
the direct costs of a student’s education. At MIT
for instance, tuition may cover only around 50% of
the cost of educating a student, the rest of the
cost is subsidized through other institute income.
Once the initial fundraising target has been
crossed, we will attempt to concentrate on building
a significant endowment for the school, so it is
sustainable and able to grow over the decades. This
is important not only for our raw survival, but also
if we want to get to the ideal of need-blind
admissions and need-based financial aid, so we can
attract the best and brightest students to the SSE
irrespective of their families’ income.
Infrastructure
Adequate teaching and research
infrastructure is essential for the school to
realize its vision. A great deal of energy over the
past year has been spent in gathering requirements
and collecting data on infrastructure from the best
universities. We are targeting for construction to
begin this summer and are currently finalizing
laboratory layouts and architectural details.
The facility program (type, number and size of
spaces needed) for the SSE was developed in
collaboration with the VPDT and the Boston based
campus and facility planning firm of Dober, Lidsky,
Craig and Associates. The program envisions the SSE
expanding to 10 departments in the next 15 years,
with a student body totaling 2000 (including 1200
undergraduate and 800 graduate students) and 200
faculty members. Further, it assumes an
MIT-Stanford-Caltech style curriculum. The
architectural schematics for the SSE complex have
recently been drawn up by architects Habib Fida Ali
and Faisal Haroon. The complex consists of three
connected 6-storey buildings located on a field
measuring 290-feet by 453-feet within the current
LUMS campus.
The entire SSE complex will have a covered area of
about 500,000 square feet, but will be developed in
two phases. In the first phase a 240,000 square feet
building will be constructed. This building will
house teaching and research labs, faculty and
graduate student offices, computer clusters,
discussion chambers, conference rooms and student
lounges. The building will have a simple grid
structure and has been designed to allow flexibility
in the internal layout, needed by an evolving SSE.
The internal layout of the building has been checked
for conformance with international safety standards
by architect Arlen Li of Payette Associates, a
Boston based firm. Work on the buildings structural
design and its air-handing and plumbing requirements
is under way. Work on the working drawings will
start later this month and construction of the
building is expected to commence in summer 2005.
Curriculum
A significant curriculum
development exercise has been undertaken for the SSE
as a prerequisite to the facility program. While
this curriculum will certainly go through an
examination and modification by the faculty we hire,
it does provide a good indication of the kind of
rigor anticipated in the SSE programs. For instance,
the school-wide core curriculum developed is very
strong in fundamental sciences (including science
labs), has a large humanities and social science
component, and gives students exposure to advanced
technology subjects at an introductory level. The
SSE core is very similar to that of MIT, Stanford,
Caltech and UC Berkeley.
Members of the VPDT have developed the program
specific curricula for undergraduate and graduate
programs in biology, chemistry, physics and
electrical engineering. The undergraduate
program-specific curriculum has been designed to
provide the students a solid understanding of all
the basic areas of their major, while at the same
time allowing them to focus on one particular area.
There is also flexibility in the curricula to allow
the student to choose the subjects of his/her own
interest. Industrial internships and research will
be built into the SSE programs; for engineering
majors a 5-year joint BS/MS program with a built-in
one-year industrial internship is also a very likely
possibility. To ensure that the SSE produces people
with leadership and entrepreneurial qualities,
physical education will likely be a graduation
requirement; and a defined two-week activity in
rural areas for building a sense of social
responsibility, perhaps along the patterns of the US
Peace Corps, is under consideration.
Going Forward
Organizationally, the SSE is still
quite limited. A 4-person Project Team at LUMS is
doing work with support from the LUMS faculty, staff
and Management Committee; and a 23-person Virtual
Program Development Team (VPDT) – a remote group of
academics and professionals. During the coming
months, we will likely continue with the activities
needed to get construction on facilities started in
the summer. For the second half of the year, we
expect to be occupied with the faculty and funding
tasks. Summer will in fact see the launch of an
outreach effort on both fronts in the US. By the end
of the year, we hope to have met our targets on both
these fronts.
Project Team, LUMS School of Science and Engineering
Vice-Chancellor, LUMS
Management Committee, LUMS
Since the feature article this time gives
considerable space to operational updates, this
section only lists the meetings and visits that
have taken place during the past months, and
adds the detail that may not be in the first
section.
Infrastructure Planning
Dr. Khurram Afridi and
architect Habib Fida Ali spent two weeks in late
March in Boston, going over the laboratory
layouts with the architectural firm Payette
Associates. Payette has significant laboratory
design experience for institutions of higher
education including a new building they are
currently doing at MIT. The initial work on the
internal layout of the SSE building was carried
out over the last two months by Dr. Afridi, Mr.
Fida Ali and architect Faisal Haroon with help
from the Virtual Program Development Team (VPDT)
members. This layout was based on the best
practices observed by the SSE team during visits
to universities over the last year. However,
Arlen Li of Payette Associates was able to
identify gaps in the design and recommend
modifications. His recommendations have been
incorporated into the SSE’s architectural
drawings.
Faculty
The VPDT and Dr. Khurram Afridi had a day-long
working meeting in Boston on March 26 to discuss
faculty and infrastructure issues. Progress was
made on important policy decisions regarding
faculty appointment and hiring, faculty
recruitment efforts, faculty startup packages
and possible research focus areas for the SSE.
Many of these deliberations are having a direct
impact on our faculty appointment processes.
Physical attendees included Drs. Adil Bashir,
Tauseef Salma, Hamid Zaman, Bilal Zuberi, Farhan
Rana, Salal Humair and Umar Mahmood. Remote
attendees included Drs. Asad Naqvi (Amsterdam),
Rizwan Gul (Bahrain), Salman Ahsan (California),
Amer Iqbal (Pakistan), Sohaib Khan (Pakistan)
and Mr. Kashif Zafar (New York). Mr. Syed Babar
Ali attended the beginning of the meeting
remotely from Pakistan.