|
The South Asia Earthquake |
LUMS SSE will not publish a full newsletter for
October 2005 in view of the tragic earthquake of
October 8, 2005.
Our
next full version will be in January 2006, at which
point we will move to quarterly newsletters.
A few reasons necessitate this decision. First,
there have been very few people in the country who
have not been affected either directly, or by a few
degrees of separation by this massive tragedy.
Second, people at LUMS, as the rest of the country,
are devoting significant time and energy to
volunteer efforts, including resource mobilization,
policy efforts, and direct relief work in forward
areas. Third, this disaster has jarred the
consciousness of the nation, and we feel we should
not compete for attention so soon when people’s
energies are focused on vastly more important
things: relief, awareness, and long-term planning
for rehabilitation.
Nature has been specially harsh over the last year.
From last December’s tsunami, to hurricane Katrina,
and the Pakistani earthquake, to name only a few,
our collective resilience is being tested. Victims
of course know no racial, religious, economic or
national boundaries, and our hearts go out to all
who have and are suffering. Consolation in words
seems the most inadequate response; we hope our
collective actions match our empathy. The signs are
positive. For the tsunami and Katrina, the world
mobilized rapidly; and already civil society in
Pakistan has responded marvelously to the challenge,
showing the deep and pervasive humanity that binds
us all.
LUMS is also trying to do whatever it can. At the
institutional level, as early as October 10, LUMS
Faculty, Staff and Students formed the LUMS
Disaster Relief Fund, for raising funds alone as
well as in partnership with effective relief
agencies. Several committees were also formed and
are working on long-term relief as well as finance
and media support. At the group and individual
level, efforts like RISEPAK (www.risepak.com,
with multiple international institutions) were seen
as international prototypes (for instance by the
Worldbank). And at a still more personal level, LUMS
faculty and students went in teams to survey
villages in Kashmir that had been cut off by
landslides, relaying back the villagers’ needs and
taking relief trucks to the areas. There are many
others at LUMS, who are working outside of LUMS-centered
initiatives, as parts of multiple other
organizations. The disaster response at LUMS, as by
the rest of civil society, has certainly been
exemplary.
But this is also a time to reflect. We need to
rethink research universities’ role in preparation
and response for large-scale emergencies. For this
is surely not the last large-scale hazard we will
have to confront. Already the massive public health
dangers of the Avian Flu are looming large over the
Asian continent, both in terms of its human and
economic costs. We need to figure out how
institutions like the LUMS SSE can help formulate
and execute public responses to such potential
emergencies.
We wish all our friends the best at this difficult
time.